On 06.06.2018 10:50, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 09:09:17 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
> So the issue is that libc is compiled without sanitizer and
> allocations done inside libc are not known to a sanitizer? For libc
> functions that return allocated memory I
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 09:09:17 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >>> So the issue is that libc is compiled without sanitizer and
> >>> allocations done inside libc are not known to a sanitizer? For libc
> >>> functions that return allocated memory I guess you mark it in the
> >>> sanitizer's int
On 06.06.2018 00:56, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 22:04:37 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>> On 05.06.2018 20:47, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>>> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>>
On 05.06.2018 18:14, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>> We've faced a pr
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 22:04:37 +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 05.06.2018 20:47, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> > Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >
> >> On 05.06.2018 18:14, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> >>> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >>>
> We've faced a problem with sanitizing part of the NetBSD userla
On 05.06.2018 20:47, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>> On 05.06.2018 18:14, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>>> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>>
We've faced a problem with sanitizing part of the NetBSD userland, as we
need to use helper functions to make sanitization possible in so
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 05.06.2018 18:14, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>
>>> We've faced a problem with sanitizing part of the NetBSD userland, as we
>>> need to use helper functions to make sanitization possible in some
>>> narrow cases that aren't clear for sanitizer
On 05.06.2018 20:15, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> The shortcoming of a new header is that mtree(8) is a tool program and
> this new header will be pulled into compat. Sanitizing tools has no
> point and there might be need in future to track changes in this header.
>
Apparently the proper way to sto
On 05.06.2018 18:14, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>> We've faced a problem with sanitizing part of the NetBSD userland, as we
>> need to use helper functions to make sanitization possible in some
>> narrow cases that aren't clear for sanitizers.
>>
>> The current problem is t
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> We've faced a problem with sanitizing part of the NetBSD userland, as we
> need to use helper functions to make sanitization possible in some
> narrow cases that aren't clear for sanitizers.
>
> The current problem is the usage of callback functions defined in
> program
