Re: [CODE] inetd FINAL

2023-07-03 Thread tlaronde
Le Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:23:13PM +0100, David Brownlee a écrit : > Some random thoughts :) > > - Would it make sense to actively reject -l or similar when -c is given I don't think so. They can be a "slip of the thumb" when passing switches and they do no harm---the problem is that the checking

Re: [CODE] inetd FINAL

2023-07-03 Thread David Brownlee
Some random thoughts :) - Would it make sense to actively reject -l or similar when -c is given - Resilient mode would probably benefit from a new {sub ,}section heading in the man page - I'd be inclined to reject a config which tries to embed a null with \000 or similar with an error David

Re: [CODE] inetd

2023-06-20 Thread tlaronde
Le Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 07:34:43PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit : > The new version of inetd is here: > > http://downloads.kergis.com/misc/inetd.tar.gz > > I have rewritten the majority of the parsing code, and put everything > in parse.c, with a lot of comments---there is no more parse_v2