Re: RFC: Enhancements/changes to sh doc and a possible sh extension

2017-10-18 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:08:50 + From:David Holland Message-ID: <20171018180850.ga16...@netbsd.org> | After chewing on it, what I think I'd like to see for builtins and | multiple shells is something like: | |- a page cd.1 that documents the basic beh

Re: RFC: Enhancements/changes to sh doc and a possible sh extension

2017-10-18 Thread David Holland
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 05:49:31PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > A while ago it was suggested (perhaps in some private mail) that perhaps > all of the builtin sh commands should have man pages of their own, rather > than only the ones which are also implemented as external commands. I think I reme

Re: RFC: Enhancements/changes to sh doc and a possible sh extension

2017-10-18 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20439.1508323...@andromeda.noi.kre.to>, Robert Elz wrote: > >wait [-n] [-p var] [job ...] > >Wait for the specified jobs to complete and return the exit status >of the last job to exit, or 127 if none of the jobs are a current >child of the shel

RFC: Enhancements/changes to sh doc and a possible sh extension

2017-10-18 Thread Robert Elz
A while ago it was suggested (perhaps in some private mail) that perhaps all of the builtin sh commands should have man pages of their own, rather than only the ones which are also implemented as external commands. As things are growing (including the sh man page) and partly inspired by the possib