On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:56:15PM +0200, Pierre Pronchery wrote:
> In the first case SIZE_T_MAX is shifted left by 16 bits and in the second
> case 32, as intended. But then why is there a cast to unsigned long long at
> all? The left operand of that binary AND (&) is a size_t anyway, and will
> n
Hi tech-userlevel@,
I just had a look at the implementation of calloc() in NetBSD's libc,
which seems to be from jemalloc actually. Its check for integer
overflows is as follows, in src/lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc.c:
3857 /*
3858 * Try to avoid division
