Re: Proposal for several minor changes to sh

2016-03-26 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:35:33 + (GMT) From:Iain Hibbert Message-ID: | > First, it has irritated me for ages there is no way to know that it is | > the NetBSD shell that is running | | Might I ask, what do you need to know this information for? Sorry,

Re: Proposal for several minor changes to sh

2016-03-22 Thread Iain Hibbert
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Robert Elz wrote: > First, it has irritated me for ages there is no way to know that it is > the NetBSD shell that is running - many (but not all) other shells > implement one, or more, predefined sh variables that can be tested > (and which can give other info about the shell

Proposal for several minor changes to sh

2016-03-15 Thread Robert Elz
I have just sent away patches for PRs 19832 35423 (those are the same thing) some of 50958 (the ?: operator, not assignment ops yet) 50959 and 50960 and to use the shell's internal syntax tables rather than for parsing purposes (deciding what is a legal var or function name is the most common use.