In article ,
Charlotte Koch wrote:
>Hiya,
>
>My inclination is to remove all code from robots(6) that is guarded
>inside "#ifdef FANCY" -- because it isn't defined at all in the code nor
>the Makefile. And "FANCY" doesn't seem to have any meaning in e.g.
>curses, either.
>
>That led me to investi
Date:Fri, 24 Jun 2022 21:35:58 + (UTC)
From:Charlotte Koch
Message-ID:
| Please help me understand what's going on here, and why I shouldn't just
| remove all this unused FANCY code.
No idea what is going on, but my inclination would be to define FANCY
in th
Am 24.06.2022 um 23:35 schrieb Charlotte Koch:
Hiya,
My inclination is to remove all code from robots(6) that is guarded
inside "#ifdef FANCY" -- because it isn't defined at all in the code nor
the Makefile. And "FANCY" doesn't seem to have any meaning in e.g.
curses, either.
That led me to inv
Hiya,
My inclination is to remove all code from robots(6) that is guarded
inside "#ifdef FANCY" -- because it isn't defined at all in the code nor
the Makefile. And "FANCY" doesn't seem to have any meaning in e.g.
curses, either.
That led me to investigate where -DFANCY even came from in the fir
