Re: [CODE] inetd FINAL

2023-07-03 Thread tlaronde
Le Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:23:13PM +0100, David Brownlee a écrit : > Some random thoughts :) > > - Would it make sense to actively reject -l or similar when -c is given I don't think so. They can be a "slip of the thumb" when passing switches and they do no harm---the problem is that the checking

Re: [CODE] inetd FINAL

2023-07-03 Thread David Brownlee
Some random thoughts :) - Would it make sense to actively reject -l or similar when -c is given - Resilient mode would probably benefit from a new {sub ,}section heading in the man page - I'd be inclined to reject a config which tries to embed a null with \000 or similar with an error David

[CODE] inetd FINAL

2023-07-03 Thread tlaronde
Here is the final code with all implemented: http://downloads.kergis.com/misc/inetd.tar.gz The new version: $ ls -l ./inetd -rwxr-xr-x 1 alceste wheel 76136 Jul 3 19:55 ./inetd $ size ./inetd textdata bss dec hex filename 563073008 11016 70331 112bb ./inetd v