Re: inetd(8): cmdif as builtin

2023-06-15 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 23-06-13 07:45, Brett Lymn wrote: | On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 08:47:10AM -0400, Mouse wrote: | > | > In any case, the major issue I would have with it is the lack of | > authentication. But that's so obvious that I assume you would be doing | > something like requiring a password - or

Re: mtree(8) vs mtree(5)

2023-06-03 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 23-06-01 15:44, Valery Ushakov wrote: | We have mtree(8) man page for our mtree that documents the format of | the mtree spec. We also have an mtree(5) page that documents the | format of the mtree spec, but that pages comes from libarchive. This | is kinda confusing. I agree! | W

Re: [RFC] inetd(8) changes proposal

2023-05-31 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 23-05-31 13:12, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: | > Also, on 23-05-30 21:03, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: | > | (When checking, so even with -C, nothing is written via | > | syslog since, then, inetd is not a daemon but just an utility---a syntax | > | checker---printing messages on st

Re: [RFC] inetd(8) changes proposal

2023-05-31 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 23-05-31 12:43, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: | And I think you're right: the info will go in a 0400 file in /tmp, and | will be a way to obtain various running infos---but for now, just the | running config (it could perhaps be extended, but not now, to add | stats, what is masked by a se

Re: [RFC] inetd(8) changes proposal

2023-05-31 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 23-05-31 03:54, Robert Elz wrote: | Date:Tue, 30 May 2023 21:03:21 +0200 | From:tlaro...@polynum.com | Message-ID: | | | Do you think that SIGINFO is sound as the signal to obtain a config DUMP in | | the syslog? | | First, dumping config to s

Re: inetd enhancements - config syntax

2021-02-01 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 21-01-31 18:12, David Holland wrote: | Alternatively you could put the glob in the include explicitly | (that is, "include dir/*.conf" That seems the sanest to me too; it's explicit, and it's also following a well-established pattern used by other applications, including: dovecot, (apache)

Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-08-01 Thread Luke Mewburn
I've decided not to pursue this any further. No objections if anyone else wants to take up the cause. On 20-07-17 23:20, Alistair Crooks wrote: | Just to get back to the original subject - fully support {} around single | statements - have been doing that in my own code for ages. | | Wou

Re: style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-07-11 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 20-07-12 10:01, Luke Mewburn wrote: | I propose that the NetBSD C style guide in to /usr/share/misc/style | is reworded to more explicitly permit braces around single statements, | instead of the current discourgement. | | IMHO, permitting braces to be consistently used: | - Adds

style change: explicitly permit braces for single statements

2020-07-11 Thread Luke Mewburn
I propose that the NetBSD C style guide in to /usr/share/misc/style is reworded to more explicitly permit braces around single statements, instead of the current discourgement. IMHO, permitting braces to be consistently used: - Adds to clarity of intent. - Aids code review. - Avoids gotofail: http