On 3/17/2022 5:52 AM, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Does anyone actually do this -- have local mounts on top of remote
mounts?
> I keep hearing about the theoretical possibility of /usr on nfs and
/usr/src or /usr/local on local ffs.
Not directly relevant to NetBSD, but the standard (IIRC) set
lity to base if that's the only
convincing use case.
Take care,
Konrad Schroder
perse...@.org
At ${WORK} we frequently use single-digit milliTorr, as well as 1e-7
Torr or so, for lab measurements. I'm not sure that you want to support
sensors in that range; I'm just mentioning it in an attempt to quantify
a possible use case.
Take care,
-Konrad
On 1/2/19 11:31 AM, David Holland wro
Is there any particular reason not to implement the requirements for
__STDC_ISO_10646__, that is, to use Unicode UCS for wchar_t? Right now
we use a locale-dependent encoding (and we are not alone in this).
So far as I am aware, using UCS for wchar_t is not required by any
standard. But is t
were connected correctly to localedef.
As a side note, this version of localedef needs better error reporting,
but that's easy enough to add.
Take care,
Konrad Schroder
perse...@.org
On 04/25/2017 08:08 PM, SODA Noriyuki wrote:
>>>>
On 4/25/17 20:08, SODA Noriyuki wrote:
* No compatibility support; e.g. existing test binaries crash
This means it has an ABI compatiblity problem, doesn't it?
Worse than that---in the current diff, there is no compatibility layer
at all, the problem manifests as missing symbols. I've thought
t it on
a branch and continue development there.
Thoughts?
Konrad Schroder
perse...@.org
