On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 10:21:21PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> [bcc tech-toolchain, followups to tech-userlevel to stay in one place]
>
> Every now and then we have some embarrassing bug with accidental
> removal or exposure of symbols in a shared library. This has been a
> constant problem
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:16:30PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 19.12.2017 14:59, Anders Magnusson wrote:
> > Den 2017-12-19 kl. 14:45, skrev Christos Zoulas:
> >> In article ,
> >> Anders Magnusson? wrote:
> >>
> >>> IIRC it was not a problem to run Emacs, it was a problem to compile it.
>
Ki, Mi, etc
so the prefixes strings are all three characters per suffix making the
code unreadable.
- Forwarded message from Brooks Davis -
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:49:33 + (UTC)
From: Brooks Davis
To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org,
svn-src-h...@freebsd.or
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:56:39AM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > I've found a one byte buffer overflow in t_vis.c. It's caused by a
> > quite reasonable confusion about an undocumented behavior of always add
> > a
ented in
addition to the requirement that the buffers by the same length.
-- Brooks
Author: Brooks Davis
Date: Wed Apr 12 23:38:31 2017 +
Fix a 1 byte buffer overflow in the strvis_basic test.
dstbuf needs to be one byte longer than srcbuf to accommodate the NUL
terminat
Kurt Jaeger submitted the following patch to vis.3 which we import into
FreeBSD from NetBSD.
-- Brooks
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210013
--- contrib/libc-vis/vis.3 2016-06-04 06:46:24.234726000 +0200
+++ contrib/libc-vis/vis.3 2016-06-04 06:47:13.515516000 +0200
