On Thu, 25 Sep 2025, Greg Troxel wrote:
I ran paranoia (pkgsrc/benchmarks/paranoia) on 9 and 10. On 9:
The number of FAILUREs encountered = 3.
The number of SERIOUS DEFECTs discovered = 4.
The number of DEFECTs discovered = 3.
The number of FLAWs discovered =
g...@lexort.com (Greg Troxel) writes:
>Does our amd64 build avoid the use of extended (80-bit) doubles?
It doesn't use them.
>Assuming no and no, do you understand why the IEEE754-expected 53 bits
>is found on amd64? Is that just happenstance of how the test is
>compiled?
i386 uses 387 math, a
mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
> g...@lexort.com (Greg Troxel) writes:
>
>>I ran paranoia (pkgsrc/benchmarks/paranoia) on 9 and 10. On 9:
>
>> The number of FAILUREs encountered = 3.
>> The number of SERIOUS DEFECTs discovered = 4.
>> The number of DEFECTs discovered
