Re: interactive shell detection in shrc

2024-10-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:16:08 -0700 From:"Greg A. Woods" Message-ID: | As I wrote in my other message yesterday I've given up entirely on | trying to test for interactivity without using $-. Yes, I saw that, and I think that's the right approach. | I have di

Re: ls.1: incorrect -O flag description

2024-10-10 Thread Valery Ushakov
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 21:37:15 +0200, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote: > The -O (not a POSIX one) flag seems incorrectly described in the manual > page. > > What it does (from a cursory look at the sources, matching the result > of testing), is simply not displaying a supplementary information > abou

ls.1: incorrect -O flag description

2024-10-10 Thread tlaronde
The -O (not a POSIX one) flag seems incorrectly described in the manual page. What it does (from a cursory look at the sources, matching the result of testing), is simply not displaying a supplementary information about the directory traversed when going recursive. It does not output only leaf (f

Re: interactive shell detection in shrc

2024-10-10 Thread Greg A. Woods
First off let me thank you for your very detailed reply! As I wrote in my other message yesterday I've given up entirely on trying to test for interactivity without using $-. It just doesn't matter for any shell supporting $ENV since they all do the right thing with $-. I have discovered (by ser