On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 07:41:34AM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> >> I don't. You're breaking an existing facility even for people who
> >> choose ([p...]) to not use the new facility that came along with it.
> > ??? If the PATH_SEARCH_OPT is not set or does not have "Q", there is
> > absolutely no change.
>> I don't. You're breaking an existing facility even for people who
>> choose ([p...]) to not use the new facility that came along with it.
> ??? If the PATH_SEARCH_OPT is not set or does not have "Q", there is
> absolutely no change.
Okay, then I misunderstood: I thought you said that post-chan
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 03:26:06PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
>
> > Everything allowed now (if I drop---as I will---my dot specification)
> > remains possible after (except "bar/foo" being executed in current
> > dir; this will have to be, explicitely, "./bar/foo", or it will be
> > searched, not execute
