Re: compilers and unused args in functions

2024-07-04 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:00:46 +0200 From:Roland Illig Message-ID: | Do you really need all these functions in a single table? Yes. This is for when a variable is set, the var struct has a function for those few variables that need some special action to be taken

Re: compilers and unused args in functions

2024-07-04 Thread Roland Illig
Am 05.07.2024 um 06:36 schrieb Robert Elz: > In sh, I have a whole set of functions that are called > via a function pointer in a data struct > > (*p->func)(arg); > > One of those functions needs a 2nd arg, which means that > to keep compatible function profiles these days, I need > to add th

Re: compilers and unused args in functions

2024-07-04 Thread Valery Ushakov
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 11:36:06 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > So, now I have all these functions (but one) with an arg they don't > need, and have no use for. > > I could add something stupid like > arg = arg; > or something to use the value (but then the compiler is likely to > warn about ar

compilers and unused args in functions

2024-07-04 Thread Robert Elz
In sh, I have a whole set of functions that are called via a function pointer in a data struct (*p->func)(arg); One of those functions needs a 2nd arg, which means that to keep compatible function profiles these days, I need to add the extra arg to all of them In the ancient past I would