Le Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:23:13PM +0100, David Brownlee a écrit :
> Some random thoughts :)
>
> - Would it make sense to actively reject -l or similar when -c is given
I don't think so. They can be a "slip of the thumb" when passing
switches and they do no harm---the problem is that the checking
Robert Elz wrote in
<2939.1688393...@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>:
|Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2023 15:51:06 -0400 (EDT)
|From:Mouse
|Message-ID: <202307021951.paa07...@stone.rodents-montreal.org>
|
|| For example, a program that calls printf but never uses any
|| floating-point
Some random thoughts :)
- Would it make sense to actively reject -l or similar when -c is given
- Resilient mode would probably benefit from a new {sub ,}section
heading in the man page
- I'd be inclined to reject a config which tries to embed a null with
\000 or similar with an error
David
Here is the final code with all implemented:
http://downloads.kergis.com/misc/inetd.tar.gz
The new version:
$ ls -l ./inetd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 alceste wheel 76136 Jul 3 19:55 ./inetd
$ size ./inetd
textdata bss dec hex filename
563073008 11016 70331 112bb ./inetd
v
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:21:24 +
From:Taylor R Campbell
Message-ID: <20230703152125.8798060...@jupiter.mumble.net>
| Not sure why calling malloc or realloc still causes jemalloc.o to be
| pulled in, in the presence of -lbsdmalloc.
libbsdmalloc doesn't appear
> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 07:45:27 + (UTC)
> From: RVP
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, RVP wrote:
>
> > Somebody should maybe add calloc() to bsdmalloc.
>
> And posix_memalign() (any others?) too, else you end up with 2
> different arenas and free()/realloc() operating on the wrong one.
The attached
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2023 15:51:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:Mouse
Message-ID: <202307021951.paa07...@stone.rodents-montreal.org>
| For example, a program that calls printf but never uses any
| floating-point values at all will not, in theory, need floating point
| support.
> [...], putting the file only under root writability is a safety
> precaution too (against one's own blunders).
> There are pros and cons either way---meaning that, you are right, it
> has to be configurable; remains the question of: what should be the
> default? Strict or not?
Hmm. For NetBSD
Le Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:36:23AM -0400, Mouse a écrit :
> > There is one more thing I'd be inclined to add: when _serving_ a
> > config as root[*], error if the configuration (including sourced
> > chunks) is writable by someone else than root.
>
> > What do you think?
>
> A reasonable thing if
Le Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 01:36:54PM +0200, ??? a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:13:45AM +, David Holland wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 05:51:13PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > > For this one I will go with the established behavior, but what should I
> > > do when someone is
> There is one more thing I'd be inclined to add: when _serving_ a
> config as root[*], error if the configuration (including sourced
> chunks) is writable by someone else than root.
> What do you think?
A reasonable thing if it's an overridable default. An extremely
annoying thing (albeit only
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:13:45AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 05:51:13PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > For this one I will go with the established behavior, but what should I
> > do when someone is passing, in octal or in hexa: "\000" ou "\x00"?
> If you don't
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:53:31PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > At least in 9.3, dlopen() in a static binary does not work. Try using
> > > a NSS module from a statically lunked binary to check that.
> >
> > It does wor
I'm almost finished with inetd(8)---I still wait for an answer about ATF
tests: to be added if my version of inetd will reach the NetBSD src
tree; if not reaching the NetBSD src tree, I will not bother with ATF.
There is one more thing I'd be inclined to add: when
_serving_ a config as root[*], er
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, RVP wrote:
Somebody should maybe add calloc() to bsdmalloc.
And posix_memalign() (any others?) too, else you end up with 2
different arenas and free()/realloc() operating on the wrong one.
-RVP
15 matches
Mail list logo
