On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:05:18 +0100
Anthony Mallet wrote:
> > Why should there be any particular minimum? It seems to me it
> > depends on what the thread is doing (though one page, whatever that
> > is on the hardware and release in question, is probably a pretty
> > hard minimum).
>
> That's
Mouse wrote in
<202111292115.qaa06...@stone.rodents-montreal.org>:
|> * The maximum is 65000.
|
|It probably is actually 65535, or 65495, or some such; if there is a
|limit that is actually 65000, it strikes me as unlikely to be anything
|but someone imposing an artificial round-human
> * The maximum is 65000.
It probably is actually 65535, or 65495, or some such; if there is a
limit that is actually 65000, it strikes me as unlikely to be anything
but someone imposing an artificial round-human-number limit.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Cam
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote in
:
|On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:31:30PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote in
|> :
|>|On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:38:35PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
|>|> DNS queries (via UDP) are limited to max 512, as that is what the
|>|> protocol always req
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:31:30PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote in
> :
> |On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:38:35PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> |> DNS queries (via UDP) are limited to max 512, as that is what the
> |> protocol always required, so can be handled by everythin
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote in
:
|On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:38:35PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
|> DNS queries (via UDP) are limited to max 512, as that is what the
|> protocol always required, so can be handled by everything (or should be).
|
|Strictly speaking, it is the minimum MTU every IPv4 i
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20211129173130.b55ba%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Joerg Sonnenberger wrote in
| :
||On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:38:35PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
||> DNS queries (via UDP) are limited to max 512, as that is what the
||> protocol always required, so can be handled by everythi
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:38:35PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> DNS queries (via UDP) are limited to max 512, as that is what the
> protocol always required, so can be handled by everything (or should be).
Strictly speaking, it is the minimum MTU every IPv4 implementation is
supposed to allow. IPv6
On Monday 29 Nov 2021, at 20:38, Robert Elz wrote:
> | In addition, I just noticed that res_nquery(3) in
> | libc/resolv/res_query.c uses a similar buffer but of size
> | min(PACKETSZ, 1024). PACKETSZ seems to be 512 bytes only.
>
> That is as it shoukd be.
> PR tge huge stack array if yiu wa
Date:Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:25:24 +0100
From:Anthony Mallet
Message-ID: <24996.47268.358308.412...@gargle.gargle.howl>
| In addition, I just noticed that res_nquery(3) in
| libc/resolv/res_query.c uses a similar buffer but of size
| min(PACKETSZ, 1024). PACKETSZ se
On Monday 29 Nov 2021, at 00:05, Anthony Mallet wrote:
> 64k is not small, so I still believe it should be on the heap.
In addition, I just noticed that res_nquery(3) in
libc/resolv/res_query.c uses a similar buffer but of size
min(PACKETSZ, 1024). PACKETSZ seems to be 512 bytes only.
So it seems
11 matches
Mail list logo
