On Sat, 22 May 2021, David Holland wrote:
To cut down on future confusion we should probably (if it's not
excessively expensive for some reason) change all the compiler configs
to call "__mcount_hook" and change the name of the C function to
always be "__mcount_impl" or "__mcount_backend" or som
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:29:30PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> This looks awesome, David, thanks for writing it!
:-)
> Might it be worth noting some of the historical legacy symbol
> naming issues that were are the root of the bug report we were just
> talking about a little while ago?
Aft
> On May 21, 2021, at 5:06 PM, David Holland wrote:
>
> The workings of the various *mcount functions are confusing and
> currently undocumented. After wading into it just now for I think the
> third time recently, I wrote the following to ease the process.
This looks awesome, David, thanks f
The workings of the various *mcount functions are confusing and
currently undocumented. After wading into it just now for I think the
third time recently, I wrote the following to ease the process.
Comments?
--
.\"
.\" Copyright (c) 2021 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
.\" All rights reserved.