Date:Thu, 13 May 2021 16:00:56 -0700
From:John Nemeth
Message-ID: <202105132300.14dn0uwz026...@server.cornerstoneservice.ca>
| On May 13, 22:37, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
| } The source is wrong to request strict C++14
| } compatibility and then use an extension
On May 13, 22:37, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
} On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:58:50PM +0200, JaromÃr DoleÄek wrote:
} > Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 21:44, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
} > > > No we don't, unless you are using PCC :D
} > > >
} > > > The block in only provides an alloca(3) prototype, and
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:58:50PM +0200, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 21:44, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
> > > No we don't, unless you are using PCC :D
> > >
> > > The block in only provides an alloca(3) prototype, and only
> > > if the compiler already #defines alloca as __bu
Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 21:44, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
> > No we don't, unless you are using PCC :D
> >
> > The block in only provides an alloca(3) prototype, and only
> > if the compiler already #defines alloca as __builtin_alloca.
> >
> > While this works for gcc in some -std modes (e.g. gnu
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:51:45PM +0200, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 01:04, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
> >
> > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 08:32:20PM +0200, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> > > Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 13:50, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 12, 202
Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 12:58, Martin Husemann a écrit :
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:51:45PM +0200, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
> > On the contrary, Linux explicitely #undefs alloca(), then
> > #define alloca() as __builtin_alloca(), so it always works, regardless
> > which -std.
>
> But isn't that o
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:51:45PM +0200, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
> On the contrary, Linux explicitely #undefs alloca(), then
> #define alloca() as __builtin_alloca(), so it always works, regardless
> which -std.
But isn't that obviously wrong and our version the correct one?
(Well, maybe we shoul
Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 01:04, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 08:32:20PM +0200, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> > Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 13:50, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 08:38:39AM +0200, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> > > > would it be a bad thing