> The new syntax would look something like:
> on/off key1=value, key2=value1 value2 value3,
> key3=â??this is a valueâ??, key4=value1 value2 â??this is value3â??;
Hm. I think this is about as good a new syntax as we're likely to get.
In particular, it offers a fairly wide variety of extensibilit
Hello again,
We have gone over the community feedback in-depth, and taken into account all of
your suggestions regarding the new backwards-compatible syntax for inetd.conf.
We have drafted a few ideas, and would like to get your thoughts and feedback on
these ideas.
To reiterate the previous thre
