Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

2020-12-28 Thread Michael van Elst
w...@netbsd.org (Thomas Klausner) writes: >I wanted to mount an ISO image (on 9.99.77/amd64), so I did, following the >guide: ># vnconfig -c vnd0 file.iso >The disklabel looks unpromising. >4 partitions: >#sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs] > a: 16868776 0 4.2

Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

2020-12-28 Thread Martin Husemann
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:43:10PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > I wanted to mount an ISO image (on 9.99.77/amd64), so I did, following the > guide: > > # vnconfig -c vnd0 file.iso > # mount -t cd9660 /dev/vnd0a /mnt > mount_cd9660: /dev/vnd0a on /mnt: Invalid argument May this image contain a

Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

2020-12-28 Thread John Nemeth
On Dec 28, 22:43, Thomas Klausner wrote: } } I wanted to mount an ISO image (on 9.99.77/amd64), so I did, } following the guide: } } # vnconfig -c vnd0 file.iso } # mount -t cd9660 /dev/vnd0a /mnt } mount_cd9660: /dev/vnd0a on /mnt: Invalid argument I always use "-r", i.e. "# mount -r -t cd

Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

2020-12-28 Thread aran
Thomas, I just tested this with the install iso from a recent NetBSD current build without issues. One thing, however, is this: images[2]$disklabel /dev/vnd0 ... 4 partitions: #sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs] a:848036 0ISO9660 0

vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

2020-12-28 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I wanted to mount an ISO image (on 9.99.77/amd64), so I did, following the guide: # vnconfig -c vnd0 file.iso # mount -t cd9660 /dev/vnd0a /mnt mount_cd9660: /dev/vnd0a on /mnt: Invalid argument # mount -t cd9660 /dev/vnd0d /mnt mount_cd9660: /dev/vnd0d on /mnt: Invalid argument but that di