> In the case of inetd, the definition of a service is not really
> configuration.
I could quibble, but, really, this is a very important insight, which I
have seen nowhere else, leading me to think everyone else - including
me - had completely missed it. Thank you very much for pointing it
out.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 08:24:56PM -0800, James Browning wrote:
> 2. To inquire about the ideal way to implement per-service
> configuration files in inetd.
Please see the other post I just wrote, even though it's somewhat deep
in the thread. (You don't necessarily need to read the rest of that
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 09:53:27PM -0500, Mouse wrote:
> Not quite. It's not about the admin having to pass a test in order to
> be one of the elite who get to use $PACKAGE. (I know that's going
> beyond what you actually wrote; it's approximately what I suspect a lot
> of people will read in
Hello again NetBSD Community,
We have been carefully reading and considering all of your responses. Your
responses have all been very helpful for giving us a sense of how the community
would like to see these changes implemented (if at all). We want to make some
clarifying points and address some
