> We are a team of senior CS students from Western Washington
> University, and we are currently working a project to implement the
> enhancements to inetd as described here:
> https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/inetd-enhancements/
> We want to get community input, so that the changes we ma
Hello NetBSD Community,
We are a team of senior CS students from Western Washington University, and we
are currently working a project to implement the enhancements to inetd as
described here:
https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/inetd-enhancements/
We are sending this email for two purposes
In article <702ebe22-e2c6-3c5f-a86b-b9eb184b1...@netbsd.org>,
Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I propose to drop .me from man.conf(5):
>
>http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00288-drop-me-from-man.conf.txt
>
>There is no evidence that it has any users and unclear whether there
>wer
Date:Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:52:05 +0100
From:Kamil Rytarowski
Message-ID: <702ebe22-e2c6-3c5f-a86b-b9eb184b1...@netbsd.org>
| I propose to drop .me from man.conf(5):
No objection (to exactly that) from me.
| There is no evidence that it has any users and unclear wh
I propose to drop .me from man.conf(5):
http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00288-drop-me-from-man.conf.txt
There is no evidence that it has any users and unclear whether there
were ever any.
It removed a direct usage of nroff (groff) from man.conf(5).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:50:02AM +, David Holland wrote:
> [...]
>
> (2) Thierry mentions kertex as an alternative to trying to import
> ordinary tex into base (which is a nonstarter), but this never goes
> anywhere;
To put clearly things about the proposal:
1) I do not propose to import T
