hi,
i386, m68k, sparc64, x86_64 have their own version of signbitl.c
I don't believe this is necessary. It is an exact copy.
80 bit and 128 bit differences are handled under the struct ieee_ext.
ok to make all users use signbitl_ieee754.c?
Index: arch/x86_64/gen/Makefile.inc
===
Date:Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:58:55 +0200
From:tlaro...@polynum.com
Message-ID: <20190413115855.ga1...@polynum.com>
| The question was more: why is it not the very last thing invoked?
An equally valid question would be why not the first? Or the last before
logins are e
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 01:27:03PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:15:49AM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > So my guess is that Vnc reinject keyboard and mouse events and so need
> > wsmoused to run (and it is after).
>
> rc.local is not run last, see rc(8)
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:15:49AM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> So my guess is that Vnc reinject keyboard and mouse events and so need
> wsmoused to run (and it is after).
rc.local is not run last, see rc(8):
rc.local is a command script to which local boot-time actions can be
a
Hello,
On a node I have recently upgraded to NetBSD 7.1.2, the launching of a
Vnc server at boot time fails, while by connecting to the node and
relaunching it, it succeeds.
Since I have stripped down the node to the bare X11 packages needed to
run it, I first tried to look if something was missi
