You're complaining loudly at someone for changing code you believe is
sacred.
- We don't want to have any code in netbsd that is too sacred to touch.
- kre is ridiculously fucking nice.
- we really, really like kre.
It's like everyone has a score. You can do negative and positive things.
Positive
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:43:37PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> By the time it reaches a release, a change to sh will likely undergo
> many months of testing by people who like to use shell scripts and build
> 16,000 packages all with very many shell scripts.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:29:29PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> I would be defending him even if the criticism was about sh making my
> own system unbootable. And it isn't.
Keep in mind all these changes occur in -current. -current has random
breakage, it happens (and it usually doesn't come fr
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:04:38PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> So stop right there. I have no desire to read your insulting diatribes.
> Nor, do I expect, have most others on this list.
You are, of course, welcome to consider my points as nothing more than
insults. You can stick your fingers in your
On Wed 15 Aug 2018 at 12:12:53 -0400, Izaac wrote:
> Yeah, I'm dragging a private conversation back onto the list. Is it
> poor etiquette? Sure.
So stop right there. I have no desire to read your insulting diatribes.
Nor, do I expect, have most others on this list.
*plonk*
-Olaf.
--
___ Olaf
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:16:55AM +, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> If you want SCO Unix you know where to find it.
Cute. If you want Linux, you know where to find it.
--
. ___ ___ . . ___
. \/ |\ |\ \
. _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:47:16PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> I for one strongly appreciate that:
> - /bin/sh now has great test coverage
Agreed.
> - Said testsuite runs without a complaint from sanitizers
> (all ~400 test cases!)
... agreed.
> - I can now apply patches that were blocked
Yeah, I'm dragging a private conversation back onto the list. Is it
poor etiquette? Sure. But this is important. If left unchecked, we
are talking about a fundamental shift in the development doctrine of
this operating system.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:25:37AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Yes,
I had written this reply nearly a year ago. But I sat on it. Now,
though, I find myself so pissed off with the changes in release
engineering/support, issues with the 8.0 release itself, and with the
recent crop-up of this /bin/sh issue that I figured I'd dig it up and
send in hope that it might
Izaac wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Izaac wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 07:46:39AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>> > So, opinions?
>>
>> Stop.
>>
>> Leave /bin/sh alone.
>
> And here we are.
If you want SCO Unix you know where to find it.
-uwe
10 matches
Mail list logo
