Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 02:45:51PM +0100, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> > I wanted to vote for option 3 if we have better tools but devel/gperftools
> > didn't build on my amd64 boxes (-current and -8):
>
> Works for me?
PKGSRC_COMPILER=clang
and mine builds too ;-)
--
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 02:45:51PM +0100, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> I wanted to vote for option 3 if we have better tools but devel/gperftools
> didn't build on my amd64 boxes (-current and -8):
Works for me?
Joerg
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> ...
> (1) Introduce a dynamic version of libc_pg.
> (2) Stop pretending that -pg means dynamic linking and implicitly add
> -static.
> (3) Stop pretending that -pg makes sense on modern hardware.
>
> Fundamentally, I think the third option is the correct way forward.
>
On 25.07.2018 14:48, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Hello all,
> the recent work on static PIE support have exposed some fundamental
> issues in the way profiling support is currently implemented. When -pg
> is used for linking, the binary will essentially get a copy of libc
> linked in, but without a
