Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread coypu
I can make it a one time message (I thought it did this already, but guess not). I lose vi files by SSH problems, and I don't reboot the server, so I only found out about ancient virecover'd files a few months later.

RFC: Change to the way sh -x works ?

2017-11-11 Thread Robert Elz
I am planning (well, have more or less implemented, but not committed) a small change to the way "sh -x" works, to cause the trace output (from -x) to continue appearing on the stderr that existed when the -x option was turned on - rather than following stderr around as the script alters it. An ex

Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread John Nemeth
My concern about this is the same as it would be about moving anything from system-wide stuff to personal stuff or updates to the default dot files. The concern is that people's personal dot files aren't going to be updated when an OS update is done. Generally, only new installs and new users

SHA-3

2017-11-11 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Back in 2014, I proposed to import a simple SHA-3 implementation into libc and libkern. There were two main objections: 1. SHA-3 wasn't finalized yet, so it might change. 2. OpenSSL might add an incompatible SHA-3 API like they did SHA-2. The SHA-3 standard has since been finalized (with no chan

Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:50:58 + (UTC) From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) Message-ID: | Just set virecover=NO in /usr/src/etc/defaults/rc.conf and have people | who want it turn it on manually from now on. Or just leave it as it always has been, and h

Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <14853.1510405...@andromeda.noi.kre.to>, Robert Elz wrote: >Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:25:20 + >From:co...@sdf.org >Message-ID: <2017112520.ga17...@sdf.org> > > | I lose vi files by SSH problems, and I don't reboot the server, so I > | only found ou

Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:25:20 + From:co...@sdf.org Message-ID: <2017112520.ga17...@sdf.org> | I lose vi files by SSH problems, and I don't reboot the server, so I | only found out about ancient virecover'd files a few months later. There is nothing wrong

Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 12:44:53AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > This is missing: > - Moving virecover to /usr/bin > - Regen'ing autoconf > - Adding it to default ~/.profile won't work for peoples using a shell that doesn't load .profile. Also, I'm not sure running virecover everytime a user logs

Re: Moving virecover to ~/

2017-11-11 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:44:53 + From:co...@sdf.org Message-ID: <2017004451.ga...@sdf.org> | This is missing: | - Moving virecover to /usr/bin | - Regen'ing autoconf | - Adding it to default ~/.profile | - Removing virecover rc script This is all ver