On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:32:35AM +, David Holland wrote:
> Is there any reason these shouldn't exist anyway? They can always be
> stuck within a suitable *_SOURCE block.
It's not a problem that we have them, but you would approximately never
want to use them:
- portability
- compilers optimi
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:06:44PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> In the next major bump we should get rid of the non-standard:
> isnanf, isinff
> (need to provide 'hidden' isnanf and provide a type-generic macro for
> it per the standard)
>
> Any objections for getting rid of the declaration
On 27.09.2017 07:38, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Apparently we do have our own version we do not install.
> https://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/include/tgmath.h
>
This version looks good. We could expand it with C11 fallback option for
the !GCC compiler and make it default for -std=c11.
I had in the past
