RE: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Terry Moore
On Thu, 8 Jun 017, Paul Goyette wrote: >Getting closer. When the original match was in the context info, the output is fine. > >But if the original match was in the title line, the output from > > grep -B2 > >includes context info from some previous match whether or not it contains the actua

RE: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Paul Goyette
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Terry Moore wrote: On Thu, 8 Jun 017, Paul Goyette wrote: PG> Don't get me wrong, I love apropos(1). But... PG> I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. [...] So am I. I completely switched over from "man -k" to an alias effecting "apropos -l" ("legacy"-mo

RE: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Terry Moore
On Thu, 8 Jun 017, Paul Goyette wrote: > PG> Don't get me wrong, I love apropos(1). But... > PG> I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. [...] > > > So am I. I completely switched over from "man -k" to an alias > > effecting "apropos -l" ("legacy"-mode): > >legacy mode is close

Re: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Paul Goyette
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Martin Neitzel wrote: PG> Don't get me wrong, I love apropos(1). But... PG> I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. [...] So am I. I completely switched over from "man -k" to an alias effecting "apropos -l" ("legacy"-mode): legacy mode is close, but it do

Re: Updating dtrace(1) man page

2017-06-08 Thread Abhinav Upadhyay
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: > >> On Jun 6, 2017, at 09:19, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> >> On Jun 6, 8:37pm, er.abhinav.upadh...@gmail.com (Abhinav Upadhyay) wrote: >> -- Subject: Re: Updating dtrace(1) man page >> >> | On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Christos

Re: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:43:01PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:51:32PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > > I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. Today's example > > is an attempt to find all the man pages that refer to file system lfs. > > Using "apropo

Re: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Abhinav Upadhyay
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Paul Goyette wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I love apropos(1). But... Thank you :) > I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. Today's example > is an attempt to find all the man pages that refer to file system lfs. > Using "apropos lfs" returns more

Re: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Martin Neitzel
PG> Don't get me wrong, I love apropos(1). But... PG> I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. [...] So am I. I completely switched over from "man -k" to an alias effecting "apropos -l" ("legacy"-mode): % apropos -l lfs lfs_segwait(2) - wait until a segment is written lfs_m

Re: Suggestion: add a "no-stemming" option to apropos(1)?

2017-06-08 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:51:32PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. Today's example > is an attempt to find all the man pages that refer to file system lfs. > Using "apropos lfs" returns more than 120 entries, complete with their > associated conte