On Thu, 13 Apr 2017, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I've found a one byte buffer overflow in t_vis.c. It's caused by a
> quite reasonable confusion about an undocumented behavior of always add
> a '\0' terminating the dst string in strnunvisx(). This patch fixes the
> test, but I think the behavior is co
I've found a one byte buffer overflow in t_vis.c. It's caused by a
quite reasonable confusion about an undocumented behavior of always add
a '\0' terminating the dst string in strnunvisx(). This patch fixes the
test, but I think the behavior is confusing and should be documented in
addition to th
