Hi Christos,
Here is a improved patch based on your code review,
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0005-improve-error-checking-improve-based-on-code-review.patch
I will send you the signal test later once I am ready.
2016-07-21 11:32 GMT-07:00 Christos
2016-07-21 10:16 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article <
> ca+sxe9uj7lg40xyt0g1v-cznxwkrnk79t0xcd4d2-qdlrma...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
>
> >I did not quite understand it.
> >
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0004-improve-error-chec
On Jul 21, 10:33am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: updates?
| Got it, I will fix it.
Thanks!
| OK, I can write a program as you designed. Right now I have netbsd and
| Linux environments, and
| can verify the ordering in these platforms.
Once you write it we can
In article ,
Charles Cui wrote:
>I did not quite understand it.
>https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/REALTIME_SIGNAL/0004-improve-error-checking.patch
>This patch removes all ret = -1 logics, and set error at kpsignal2,
>did you want to set error code inside sigput?
Y
Date:Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:39:46 -0700
From:Charles Cui
Message-ID:
| In conclusion, you think the signals are consumed
| at the time of context switch.
No, not just a context switch (that is when one process stops running - on a
cpu - and another replaces it) -
