Thanks Robert for your understanding.
In conclusion, you think the signals are consumed
at the time of context switch. I will keep this information
in mind and see how all functions are connected.
Thanks Charles
2016-07-20 9:15 GMT-07:00 Robert Elz :
> Date:Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:28:13
Please see my comments below.
2016-07-20 7:47 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> In article jbuco6x1ct4+7fjwq...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Charles Cui wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
> >
> >2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
> >
> >> On Jul 1
Date:Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:28:13 +0200
From:Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?=
Message-ID: <20160720132813.gr43...@trav.math.uni-bonn.de>
| > so before any user code can execute again
| ... on this CPU. What about the other CPUs? Do all a processes LWPs run
| on the s
In article ,
Charles Cui wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.
>
>2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas :
>
>> On Jul 17, 2:02am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>>
>> | Hi Christos,
>> |
>> | I considere
> Next note, that if we're doing this, kernel code is obviously running
On one of the CPUs, yes.
> so before any user code can execute again
... on this CPU. What about the other CPUs? Do all a processes LWPs run
on the same CPU?
