On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Morgan ``Indrora'' Gangwere wrote:
> Currently, I know of no services that are easily deployed on inetd
> except bozohttpd and potentially BIND.
BIND would not be easy nor really useful via inetd.
Some other common services that are easily deployed:
tftp
pop3
ftpd
Other se
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
> First, it has irritated me for ages there is no way to know that it is
> the NetBSD shell that is running - many (but not all) other shells
> implement one, or more, predefined sh variables that can be tested
> (and which can give other info about the shell
In article ,
Morgan ``indrora'' Gangwere wrote:
>@cristos / world,
>
>My proposal draft is available:
>http://tsunami.zaibatsutel.net/gsoc16_netbsd_proposal.txt
>
>I'd appreciate any feedback which can help rough out any edges seen.
Something missing:
[FREEBSD-INETD] However, no
Correc
> It works correctly on NFS if you have the locking daemon setup?
NetBSD doesn't support the client side of NLM, does it?
Ages ago, I wrote the client side (for 3.0), but nobody picked that up.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:10:57PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> It works correctly on NFS if you have the locking daemon setup? Besides,
> is there even a valid reason for using NFS for pidfiles? I would expect
> /var/run to be a minimal tmpfs in that kind of installations.
None of my (plent
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:43:31PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:53:03PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2016 14:53:46 you wrote:
> > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 23:29:37 +
> > >
> > > Roy Marples wrote:
> > > > pidfile(3) is pretty crap - it just w
