Re: Soliciting opinions on desired "envstat -S" behavior

2010-03-19 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 19/03/2010, Paul Goyette wrote: > Currently, the -S option for envstat(8) is documented to > > ...restore defaults to all devices registered with the framework. > This will remove all properties that were set in the configuration > file to the setting that the drivers use by default

Re: dbcool, envsys, powerd shutting down my machine

2016-01-30 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 30 January 2016 at 11:01, Edgar Fuß wrote: > I don't know whether this is a userland or kernel issue or a layer 8 problem. > > After running a customized kernel, I found a server powered down. > The culprit turned out to be dbcool->envsys->powerd fabulating some > temperature > rose above limi

Re: dbcool, envsys, powerd shutting down my machine

2016-02-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 1 February 2016 at 08:53, Julian Coleman wrote: >> [lm0] >> Fan0: N/A >> Fan1: 3245 RPM >> Fan2: N/A > > I don't think that the chips that lm supports have fan speed adjustment, > so lm0 fan1 will always run at 100%. It does

Re: dbcool, envsys, powerd shutting down my machine

2016-02-02 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 2016-02-01 1:07, Roy Marples wrote: On 30/01/2016 19:39, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: In general, I personally don't think it ever makes sense to shutdown by default when the temperature is exceeded, since most of these sensors aren't really all that reliable (especially if you&

Re: dbcool, envsys, powerd shutting down my machine

2016-02-03 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 2016-02-03 10:06, Eduardo Horvath wrote: On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: Wouldn't the correct solution then be to kill the process-intensive jobs, instead of shutting down the whole system? That doesn't really make too much sense. In theory, if the CPU has a

Re: lm0 at isa vs. lm0 at wbsio at isa

2016-02-16 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 15 February 2016 at 04:40, Edgar Fuß wrote: > What's the reason for wbsio(4) to existxs, i.e. what's the advantage of > wbsio* at isa port 0x4e > lm* at wbsio > over > lm0 at isa? port 0x290 ... > ? How do you know that your lm(4) is at port 0x290? >From the l

Re: Dealing with strange disk devices

2019-10-28 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
To provide a bit more context: this code path with the potential division by zero has been in the tree for over a decade; if there exist any real devices with sector size below DEV_BSIZE, they would have resulted in a div-by-zero since 2006-11-25. The panic I fixed was a result of interaction

Re: Dealing with strange disk devices

2019-10-28 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 14:23, Mouse wrote: > > > To provide a bit more context: this code path with the potential > > division by zero has been in the tree for over a decade; [...] > > I once found I had a disk that was just broken enough to appear as a > disk, butit reported itself as having zer

Re: cvsweb anti-bot protection (was: Retrieving MAC address from struct ifnet)

2025-07-03 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 04:30, Jörg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On 7/3/25 6:23 AM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > These AIs literally behave the exact same way as humans; they're > > simply dumber and more persistent. The way CVSweb is designed, it's > > easily

Re: cvsweb anti-bot protection (was: Retrieving MAC address from struct ifnet)

2025-07-02 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 11:42, Mouse wrote: > > >> I can't easily check -current, because HTTP access to cvsweb has > >> been broken; it now insists on trying to ram HTTPS down my throat. > > Side note: it is far worse than http vs. https, it uses www/anubis > > [...JavaScript worker threads...sha25

Re: cvsweb anti-bot protection (was: Retrieving MAC address from struct ifnet)

2025-07-03 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 10:18, Mouse wrote: > Actually, most offenders of type (1) usually just go into the automated > list, because I don't use the top and bottom addresses of my netblock > for anything but scanner sentinels; anyone trying to access them goes > into the automated list. Most addre

Re: cvsweb anti-bot protection (was: Retrieving MAC address from struct ifnet)

2025-07-02 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 22:20, matthew green wrote: > > > Why would we NOT want to have AI train on our source code? > > they abuse services - DDoS sites constantly. many projects have been > restricting access because otherwise they're not available to humans. > > they don't keep licenses on code.