>
> Of course, this applies to eveyone. And I'm know from personal experience
> that thinking about what all the relevant context and background is takes
> quite a bit of time.
Well noted Christoph!
>
> --chris
Emmanuel
> On 24 Jun 2025, at 4:08 PM, Edgar Fu� wrote:
>
> What IPF does (external/bsd/ipf/netinet/ip_fil_netbsd.c) is:
>
> # if __NetBSD_Version__ >= 499001100
>error = ip6_if_output(ifp, ifp, m0, satocsin6(dst), rt);
> # else
>error = nd6_output(ifp, ifp, m0, dst6,
What IPF does (external/bsd/ipf/netinet/ip_fil_netbsd.c) is:
# if __NetBSD_Version__ >= 499001100
error = ip6_if_output(ifp, ifp, m0, satocsin6(dst), rt);
# else
error = nd6_output(ifp, ifp, m0, dst6, rt);
# endif
I also stumbled across a comment i
I wanted to reply to this earlier but it is probably better that it took so
long and you nobody commented for a couple of days to drive my point home.
Your message is very difficult to respond to for a number of reasons:
- it's difficult to understand what you are talking about.
- you don't share
> On 22 Jun 2025, at 3:12 PM, Robert Swindells wrote:
>
>
> Emmanuel Nyarko wrote:
>>
>> I am currently working on policy based routing (based on outgoing interface)
>>
>> there’ a previously written code for ipv6 which I’ve taken from Jonathan
>> A. Kollasch long time ago. and he used nd
Emmanuel Nyarko wrote:
>
> I am currently working on policy based routing (based on outgoing interface)
>
> there’ a previously written code for ipv6 which I’ve taken from Jonathan
> A. Kollasch long time ago. and he used nd6_output function which
> appears to be removed from netbsd.
[snip]
>
