OK kn with guenther's suggestions in.
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:22:30 +1000
> From: David Gwynne
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:09:59PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:03:58AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > on modern sparc64s (think fire or sparc enterprise Mx000 boxes),
> > > setting up and tearing down
Is the setup and teardown per transfer or when file is opened and closed?
Or is it set up once per context switch of task?
I am partly interested cos I would like to improve mt one day (as user of
tape
and Sparc64 Txxx) if I get the time.
Andrew
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 10:22, Mark Kettenis wro
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:38:42PM -0900, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:00 PM wrote:
>
> > getsockopt(2) and setsockopt(2) take a void pointer for the third
> > parameter so there is no need for any of these casts.
> >
>
> Yep.
>
>
> > I can do other style(9)-type cleanup
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:37:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I noticed that the throttling for peers which was added some time ago is
> incomplete. The following diff solved these issues.
>
> In rde_update_queue_runner() only process peers which are currently not
> throttled. Additionally only
Hi,
If we introduce a mutex for the igmp module we can drop the NETLOCK
from igmp_slowtimo(). The router_info list, rti_head, and its entries
are only ever accessed within the igmp module. The mutex also needs
to protect igmp_timers_are_running.
This is largely a monkey-see-monkey-do imitation
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:04:46PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:50:10PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > Right now, vmd already features an excellent privsep model to ensure
> > the process servicing the VM requests to the outside world is running
> > with the lowest possibl
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 05:51:20PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:37:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > I noticed that the throttling for peers which was added some time ago is
> > incomplete. The following diff solved these issues.
> >
> > In rde_update_queue_runner()
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:22:23PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:07:13PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch implements a mechanism to allow users register an I/O port
> > with a special file descriptor (kickfd) which can be monitored for
> > events using
Gentle bump on this. Would be nice if this were fixed for the next
release.
On 2018-10-07 10:55, Rian Hunter wrote:
(re-posting because I realized the last patch didn't apply cleanly)
lib/libfuse/fuse.c was using a EINTR return from kevent() to detect
when a signal had occurred, but in a multi
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:03:59PM -0700, Rian Hunter wrote:
> Gentle bump on this. Would be nice if this were fixed for the next release.
>
> On 2018-10-07 10:55, Rian Hunter wrote:
> > (re-posting because I realized the last patch didn't apply cleanly)
Your patch does not apply due to whitespace
> On 19 Oct 2018, at 7:15 pm, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:22:30 +1000
>> From: David Gwynne
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:09:59PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:03:58AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
on modern sparc64s (think fire or spa
> On 19 Oct 2018, at 9:59 pm, Andrew Grillet wrote:
>
> Is the setup and teardown per transfer or when file is opened and closed?
> Or is it set up once per context switch of task?
>
> I am partly interested cos I would like to improve mt one day (as user of
> tape
> and Sparc64 Txxx) if I ge
On Fri, Oct 19 2018, at 4:02 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:03:59PM -0700, Rian Hunter wrote:
>> Gentle bump on this. Would be nice if this were fixed for the next release.
>>
>> On 2018-10-07 10:55, Rian Hunter wrote:
>> > (re-posting because I realized the last patch didn
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, October 19, 2018 5:15 PM, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:22:30 +1000
> > From: David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:09:59PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:03:58AM +1000, Dav
> On 20 Oct 2018, at 11:56 am, Joseph Mayer wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Friday, October 19, 2018 5:15 PM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>
>>> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:22:30 +1000
>>> From: David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au
>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:09:59PM +1000, David Gwy
> On 20 Oct 2018, at 4:01 am, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:04:46PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:50:10PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>>> Right now, vmd already features an excellent privsep model to ensure
>>> the process servicing the VM requests
On Saturday, October 20, 2018 10:14 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On 20 Oct 2018, at 11:56 am, Joseph Mayer joseph.ma...@protonmail.com wrote:
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Friday, October 19, 2018 5:15 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Date: Fri, 19 Oc
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:44:29AM +, Joseph Mayer wrote:
>
> Last iteration from me on this one.
>
> Why is this not a problem on some other architectures?
It is a problem, it's just that other archs don't have an iommu like
sparc64.
> I'd have thought DMA and hardware being assigned trans
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:20 AM Scott Cheloha
wrote:
...
> Sure, looks cleaner. ok?
ok guenther@
20 matches
Mail list logo
