On 2011/02/17 19:37, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> So here is a better diff, plus the changes to the manpage and usage() which
> were
> lacking.
> When I get a ENOBUFS in UDP I simply return to event_dispatch().
Nice, it is a bit more consistent than netblast. With 1 byte UDP:
Sent by tcpbenc
At least jeremy@ and landry@ got confused about this, so I expect more people
to ask.
The algorithms for package updates are a bit complicated, to say the least.
When you update a package with shared libraries, those can get split off
into a separate package with a .lib name (which is well known).
On 2011-02-19, Marc Espie wrote:
> At least jeremy@ and landry@ got confused about this, so I expect more people
> to ask.
>
> The algorithms for package updates are a bit complicated, to say the least.
> When you update a package with shared libraries, those can get split off
> into a separate pa
http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~lusec001/moin.cgi/Software/OBSD_Recursive_pkg_del
Luis
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Jona Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-19, Marc Espie wrote:
> > At least jeremy@ and landry@ got confused about this, so I expect more
> people
> > to ask.
> >
> > The algorithms for pa
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Eric wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Philip Guenther
wrote:
> ...
>>> Regarding the latter: if you're intending that this should affect all
>>> programs without any changes to the program themse
