On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 06:06:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/07/02 16:49, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 15:51 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > Use-case: some people want to branch automated installs based on
> > > whether
> > > pkg_add -u (or some other variation) act
On 2023/07/02 16:49, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 15:51 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Use-case: some people want to branch automated installs based on
> > whether
> > pkg_add -u (or some other variation) actually did something.
> >
> > As usual we ignore quirks. This adds a flag (-
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 04:49:41PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 15:51 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Use-case: some people want to branch automated installs based on
> > whether
> > pkg_add -u (or some other variation) actually did something.
> >
> > As usual we ignore quirks
On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 15:51 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Use-case: some people want to branch automated installs based on
> whether
> pkg_add -u (or some other variation) actually did something.
>
> As usual we ignore quirks. This adds a flag (-DSYSPATCH_LIKE)
> which governs the behavior. Code is f
Use-case: some people want to branch automated installs based on whether
pkg_add -u (or some other variation) actually did something.
As usual we ignore quirks. This adds a flag (-DSYSPATCH_LIKE)
which governs the behavior. Code is fairly self-explanatory.
I had no better idea for the flag name s
