> De : mxb [mailto:m...@alumni.chalmers.se], 30 juin 2014 03:26
> Could you please, post updated version to the list?
Sure!
--- /dev/null Mon Jun 30 07:57:57 2014
+++ tarpitd.c Fri Jun 27 14:01:35 2014
@@ -0,0 +1,525 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Sebastien Leclerc. All rights reserved.
+ * Co
Could you please, post updated version to the list?
//mxb
On 27 jun 2014, at 20:09, Leclerc, Sebastien
wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson , 2014-06-27 11:00
>>
>>> +/* Stolen from ftp-proxy */
>>
>> Old version of ftp-proxy I guess. It hasn't used DIOCNATLOOK for several
>> releases, it has switch
> Stuart Henderson , 2014-06-27 11:00
>
> > +/* Stolen from ftp-proxy */
>
> Old version of ftp-proxy I guess. It hasn't used DIOCNATLOOK for several
> releases, it has switched to the much easier-to-use divert-to / getsockname().
And also :
> Henning Brauer , 2014-06-27 14:07
> noo
* Leclerc, Sebastien [2014-06-27 16:40]:
> + if (ioctl(pfdev, DIOCNATLOOK, &pnl) == -1)
no
DIOCNATLOOK is stupid. I'll celebrate the day when I can kill it.
Please look at less ancient ftp-proxy/*-proxy code for inspiration.
> De : Stuart Henderson [mailto:st...@openbsd.org]
>
> On 2014/06/27 09:58, Leclerc, Sebastien wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would this piece of code be useful to someone else than me?
>
> Not sure about base, but it may make sense to add to ports.
I'm not familiar with the creation of a port, but I'm
On 2014/06/27 09:58, Leclerc, Sebastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would this piece of code be useful to someone else than me?
Not sure about base, but it may make sense to add to ports.
> +/* Stolen from ftp-proxy */
Old version of ftp-proxy I guess. It hasn't used DIOCNATLOOK for several
releases, it h
Hi,
Would this piece of code be useful to someone else than me?
It works with pf's divert-to to block some scanners. It's basically a
stripped-down spamd(8), that listens to every TCP connection that is
diverted to it, and sends the received data to the great bitbucket in
the sky, one byte per se
