On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:46:22 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>there is some pretty serious hardware behind it...
>http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/indexabout.html
Those guys have some serious uses for that equipment in addition to
being a great source of ftp mirrors.
They are ready (or very close) to h
On 2010/07/03 18:17, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > 35M, that is insane. Either they have machines with infinite memory or you
> > can kill the boxes easily.
some would also say that 16K is insane ;-)
> You don't need 35MB per client
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> 35M, that is insane. Either they have machines with infinite memory or you
> can kill the boxes easily.
You don't need 35MB per client connection if interfaces like sendfile(2)
are used. All the kernel has to guarantee in that case i
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 11:54:17AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Does anyone know offhand the reason why network connections fail
> if socket buffers are set above 256k?
>
There is this magical define in uipc_socket2.c called SB_MAX that limits
the socket buffers to 256k going over that line m
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 11:54:17AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Does anyone know offhand the reason why network connections fail
> if socket buffers are set above 256k?
You might have to patch sb_max for that.
Joerg
