On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
[...]
> Here we go. This should be better.
ok tb
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 04:08:55PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:48:43PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Instead of adding similar checks all over the place introduce a
> > > valid_uri() function that che
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 04:08:55PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:48:43PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Instead of adding similar checks all over the place introduce a
> > valid_uri() function that checks if a URI is valid enough for rpki-client.
> > rpki-client does not
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:48:43PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Instead of adding similar checks all over the place introduce a
> valid_uri() function that checks if a URI is valid enough for rpki-client.
> rpki-client does not accept files or directories starting with ., bails on
> URI that have
