Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I'm not sure to what extent this makes IBT less effective. Can the
> retpolines be used as gadgets to bypass IBT? Should we stop enabling
> retpolines by default?
>
> What *is* obvious is that retpolines are incompatible wuth shadow
> stacks. Is there an alternative tha
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:23:14 -0600
>
> Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> > Mark Kettenis:
> >
> > > This port has some infrastructure to use an optimized function that
> > > uses a function pointer. Not sure why for arm64 it actually uses that
> > > infrastructure,
