On 2023/10/21 09:31, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
> > relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
> > -current) to bump buffers on them.
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
-current) to bump buffers on them.
Hi Stuart,
Meanwhile I also did some digging and opened a bug at Squid wi
After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
-current) to bump buffers on them.
On 2023/10/20 13:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> > that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> > processes.
> >
> > After some de
On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> processes.
>
> After some debugging the limit from net.unix.dgram.sendspace came up as
>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:09:08PM +0200, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> processes.
>
> After some debugging the limit from net.unix.dgram.se
