On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:25:22PM GMT, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:32:05PM GMT, Andre Stoebe wrote:
> >
> > - df -ikl
> > + df ${DFARGS-"-ikl"}
> >
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> Instead of ${DFARGS-"-ikl"}, you should most likely be using:
>
> ${DFARGS:-"-ikl"}
>
> Cheers,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:32:05PM GMT, Andre Stoebe wrote:
>
> - df -ikl
> + df ${DFARGS-"-ikl"}
>
Hi Andre,
Instead of ${DFARGS-"-ikl"}, you should most likely be using:
${DFARGS:-"-ikl"}
Cheers,
Raf
On 2019/10/28 10:39, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I also think this is getting out of hand.
>
> This script is supposed to be a simplistic subsystem providing the
> minimum. Intentionally.. Adding this option today, another option
> tomorrow, eventually this turns into a ${} scribble-fest. And somewh
I also think this is getting out of hand.
This script is supposed to be a simplistic subsystem providing the
minimum. Intentionally.. Adding this option today, another option
tomorrow, eventually this turns into a ${} scribble-fest. And somewhere
around the time the script doubles in size, bugs
Hi Nick,
Nick Holland wrote on Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 02:27:46PM -0400:
> In version 1.78 of /etc/daily, the -i flag was added to the df output.
> Apparently, some people run out of inodes.
>
> I only seem to run out of disk space, and too often, my eye skims
> the daily report from a machine, loo
Hello Nick,
> Those of us that don't worry about running out of inodes, we can
> set DF_FLAGS in /etc/daily.local to be whatever we want, in my
> case, I like "-hl" (currently, it's "-ikl")
I really like the idea, because getting human-readable numbers in the
report without replicating functional
In version 1.78 of /etc/daily, the -i flag was added to the df output.
Apparently, some people run out of inodes.
I only seem to run out of disk space, and too often, my eye skims
the daily report from a machine, looks at the last column,sees a
small percentage, and I decide, "all is good", even i
