On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:47 +, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote:
> You might say, "spideroak, zero-knowledge, means they
> couldn't/wouldn't hand over data, and even if they did, it would be
> meaningless, because it's encrypted client-side without exposure of
> passwords or keys." If this is t
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:16 +, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote:
> > From: Ryan DeShone [mailto:r...@deshone.net]
> >
> > As someone else has mentioned, the (untested) hypothesis behind the
> > warrant canary is that while the government can prevent you from
> &
Hearty +1 for tmux. Also allows you to examine scrollback in a more
sane manner as well as searching it.
Also use GNU Screen in some cases. While I don't like it as much as
tmux, certain distros don't have tmux in the official repos.
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:03 -0700, Matt Simmons wrote:
> More o
keep track of the output, but at least you have a
record of your inputs.
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:13 -0700, Matt Simmons wrote:
> Certain distros are wrong and should feel bad ;-)
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Ryan DeShone
> wrote:
> > Hearty +1 for tmux. Also allows yo
gal sense, nor would I
recommend it for such purposes. Great for keeping an external memory of
how you accomplished things or for playing the (non-legal) blame game
when necessary.
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 22:31 -0600, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> On 2015-10-29 12:54, Ryan DeShone wrote:
> > I agr
