On 11/12/2013 6:24 PM, berg...@merctech.com wrote:
I've got about 45TB (wasn't that once considered 'large'?) of data on
a GPFS filesystem.
I'm looking for efficient ways to find files, based on metadata.
Running "find / -ls" is not a good option anymore. :)
I'd like to be able to que
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:24 PM, wrote:
> I don't want to run desktop-oriented tools like updatedb
updatedb rather predates the notion of modern desktops, doesn't it? This
assertion seems just a bit silly.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber.
On 11/12/2013 04:02 PM, Loic Tortay wrote:
> On 13/11/2013 00:24, berg...@merctech.com wrote:
>>
>> I've got about 45TB (wasn't that once considered 'large'?) of data on
>> a GPFS filesystem.
>>
>> I'm looking for efficient ways to find files, based on metadata.
>>
>> Running "find / -ls" is not a
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, berg...@merctech.com wrote:
I've got about 45TB (wasn't that once considered 'large'?) of data on
a GPFS filesystem.
I'm looking for efficient ways to find files, based on metadata.
Running "find / -ls" is not a good option anymore. :)
I'd like to be able to query
On 13/11/2013 00:24, berg...@merctech.com wrote:
I've got about 45TB (wasn't that once considered 'large'?) of data on
a GPFS filesystem.
I'm looking for efficient ways to find files, based on metadata.
Running "find / -ls" is not a good option anymore. :)
I'd like to be able to query
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:24:10PM -0500, berg...@merctech.com wrote:
> I'm looking for efficient ways to find files, based on metadata.
I'm not sure if this does exactly what you want (or even if it's reached
general availability), but I know they're looking at the sorts of things
you descrivbed:
