On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, john boris wrote:
David
Thanks for the info. First I might be wrong on the actual number as this
server can have at most 24g of ram maybe 32 but it will not boot when you
put 16g in it.
As for the slow file transfer it is only one machine at a a time and
although I have 17
David
Thanks for the info. First I might be wrong on the actual number as this
server can have at most 24g of ram maybe 32 but it will not boot when you
put 16g in it.
As for the slow file transfer it is only one machine at a a time and
although I have 17 vms running only one is live and that runs
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, john boris wrote:
Okay I am doing this from my iPhone so I am trying to answer everything
1. I am tied to scp because my COBOL app needs a program called eroded
which will not port to Linux I have a lot of that covered but we are moving
to PowerSchool in the cloud so I need
We have a Chatsworth evolution sidecar vertical cable management accessory
for a 2 post telco rack. It's pretty nice. Right now we're at the point of
changing the existing single sided accessory out for a double sided to run
fiber on one side and copper on the other. Definitely, we'll be getting th
If switching hypervisors is still an option, there’s a free edition of VMware,
and should more resources materialize in the future you can upgrade from the
free edition just by applying a license key. But John says he’s already
committed to VirtualBox.
(Keep in mind that, while VirtualBox prope
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, john boris wrote:
> 3. I am using virtual box because $WORK doesn't like to spend money and
> our main it office uses the free version which I think is stupid. Plus I
> did all of testing and setup with virtual box and I don't have the time and
> resources to text
Okay I am doing this from my iPhone so I am trying to answer everything
1. I am tied to scp because my COBOL app needs a program called eroded
which will not port to Linux I have a lot of that covered but we are moving
to PowerSchool in the cloud so I need these systems as is for historical
reasons
You'll almost certainly be much happier getting VMware. The Essentials pack
(three servers at 2 CPUs each) lists for $560, . There will be even less
overhead than in Ubuntu, better support, probably better compatibility.
You'll want at least 16GB of RAM, and when people realize how easy and chea
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:57 PM, john boris wrote:
> Here at $work they have decide to get one server to handle 17+ of my
> current servers. I am doing this right now with two HP DL-160 G5. Stupid HP
> has some weird Memory configurations. Anyway those two HPs sound like Jet
> engines although th
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, john boris wrote:
Here at $work they have decide to get one server to handle 17+ of my
current servers. I am doing this right now with two HP DL-160 G5. Stupid HP
has some weird Memory configurations. Anyway those two HPs sound like Jet
engines although they are in our NOC I
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:57:11PM -0400, john boris wrote:
> Here at $work they have decide to get one server to handle 17+ of my
> current servers. I am doing this right now with two HP DL-160 G5. Stupid HP
> has some weird Memory configurations. Anyway those two HPs sound like Jet
> engines alth
Here at $work they have decide to get one server to handle 17+ of my
current servers. I am doing this right now with two HP DL-160 G5. Stupid HP
has some weird Memory configurations. Anyway those two HPs sound like Jet
engines although they are in our NOC I don't hear them.
This server will be run
David,
Thanks for that info. Sounds promising.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:35 PM, David Lang wrote:
> doing a quick google search for xrandr fix overscan is returning a lot of
> links, (some good, some not as usual)
>
> see if your setup supports
>
> xrandr --output --set underscan on
>
> other
13 matches
Mail list logo
