On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jeff Wasilko wrote:
> What about storage failover? How long of a pause can ESX tolerate while
> a clustered NFS server fails over betwen heads?
I haven't specifically tested ESX and NAS because my company is still
stuck on fibrechannel SAN, but I can tell you that when the SA
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> Well, that correlates to a question I've had : are people actually
> comfortable putting their VMDKs on NFS? That just doesn't seem like
> something that would perform well.
Actually, NFS (particularly enterprise NAS like NetApp) works incredibly
w
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:37:25PM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org [mailto:tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org]
> > On Behalf Of Derek J. Balling
> >
> > Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison of, say, iSCSI vs. NFS for VM
> > performance?
>
> I did a side-by-si
In the past 10 days or so, at least 3 or 4 people that I know have had
either Yahoo or Gmail accounts hijacked and used to send spam. Some
are quite technical, others not so much.
This doesn't seem to be the old "facebook attack" as all but one use a
different password for FB than their email acc
> From: tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org [mailto:tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org]
> On Behalf Of Derek J. Balling
>
> Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison of, say, iSCSI vs. NFS for VM
> performance?
I did a side-by-side comparison of NFS versus iscsi... The storage is
solaris ZFS, and the hypervi
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Nick Silkey wrote:
> NFS-to-ESX NetApp heads replicating to cross-town filers via SnapMirror.
Well, that correlates to a question I've had : are people actually comfortable
putting their VMDKs on NFS? That just doesn't seem like something that would
perform well.
H
