Saikiran Madugula wrote:
autoheader and autoconf should be sufficient ?
So is autoreconf, and it's 9 keystrokes fewer. :-)
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
> I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type.
> Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my
> responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as well? or does someone
> else run the appropriate utilities (aclocal; autoconf; autoheader; automa
autoheader and autoconf should be sufficient ?
Thanks,
Saikiran.
Guy Harris wrote:
Fulko Hew wrote:
I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type.
Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my
responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as
Fulko Hew wrote:
I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type.
Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my
responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as well?
No.
or does someone
else run the appropriate utilities (aclocal; autoconf;
I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type.
Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my
responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as well? or does someone
else run the appropriate utilities (aclocal; autoconf; autoheader; automake)
to r
Mark Bednarczyk wrote:
Can someone explain to me the difference between these two calls,
pcap_sendpacket vs. pcap_inject, introducted in 0.8.3?
The difference is that pcap_sendpacket() returns 0 on success and
pcap_inject() returns the number of bytes written on success.
From what I could
Thank you for resolving the issue. I have now updated our distro
with the new libpcap/tcpdump 0.9.7 that passes verification.
JGH
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I have replaced the archive with one that d
Can someone explain to me the difference between these two calls,
pcap_sendpacket vs. pcap_inject, introducted in 0.8.3?
/*
* API compatible with WinPcap's "send a packet" routine - returns -1
* on error, 0 otherwise.
*
* XXX - what if we get a short write?
*/
int
pcap_sendpacket(pcap_t