Re: [tcpdump-workers] supplying patches to libpcap

2007-08-20 Thread Guy Harris
Saikiran Madugula wrote: autoheader and autoconf should be sufficient ? So is autoreconf, and it's 9 keystrokes fewer. :-) - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.

Re: [tcpdump-workers] supplying patches to libpcap

2007-08-20 Thread Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
> I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type. > Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my > responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as well? or does someone > else run the appropriate utilities (aclocal; autoconf; autoheader; automa

Re: [tcpdump-workers] supplying patches to libpcap

2007-08-20 Thread Saikiran Madugula
autoheader and autoconf should be sufficient ? Thanks, Saikiran. Guy Harris wrote: Fulko Hew wrote: I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type. Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as

Re: [tcpdump-workers] supplying patches to libpcap

2007-08-20 Thread Guy Harris
Fulko Hew wrote: I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type. Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as well? No. or does someone else run the appropriate utilities (aclocal; autoconf;

[tcpdump-workers] supplying patches to libpcap

2007-08-20 Thread Fulko Hew
I am about to provide a patchset for supporting my newly added DLT type. Since my changes also involve a minor change to 'configure.in', is it my responsibility to provide patches 'configure' as well? or does someone else run the appropriate utilities (aclocal; autoconf; autoheader; automake) to r

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap_send_packet vs. pcap_inject functions

2007-08-20 Thread Guy Harris
Mark Bednarczyk wrote: Can someone explain to me the difference between these two calls, pcap_sendpacket vs. pcap_inject, introducted in 0.8.3? The difference is that pcap_sendpacket() returns 0 on success and pcap_inject() returns the number of bytes written on success. From what I could

Re: [tcpdump-workers] libpcap 0.9.7 gpg key

2007-08-20 Thread John Gatewood Ham
Thank you for resolving the issue. I have now updated our distro with the new libpcap/tcpdump 0.9.7 that passes verification. JGH On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Michael Richardson wrote: "Michael" == Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> I have replaced the archive with one that d

[tcpdump-workers] pcap_send_packet vs. pcap_inject functions

2007-08-20 Thread Mark Bednarczyk
Can someone explain to me the difference between these two calls, pcap_sendpacket vs. pcap_inject, introducted in 0.8.3? /* * API compatible with WinPcap's "send a packet" routine - returns -1 * on error, 0 otherwise. * * XXX - what if we get a short write? */ int pcap_sendpacket(pcap_t