- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Unifying Insert and InsertText
> Hear hear! Less is more, less is more, less is more. COME ON
> CHANT HOWARD&#
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tapestry users'"
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 6:45 AM
Subject: RE: Unifying Insert and InsertText
> How were you planning on addressing the auto-chunking
> characteristic
f the rough edges that I get
cut by myself.
In otherwords, and in the sake of the less is more mantra, forget all
of the above... +1
Erik
On May 14, 2005, at 3:27 AM, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
+1 too many components that do almost the same thing just causes
confusion
Vjeran Marcink
+1 too many components that do almost the same thing just causes confusion
Vjeran Marcinko wrote:
Hi.
What do people think about unifying Insert and InsertText ? Actually, I mean
adding InsertText functionality to Insert? I hope they are not so
incompatibile for that ...Simplier and less confusion
textfield and validfield :).
--- Pat
> -Original Message-
> From: Vjeran Marcinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 9:30 PM
> To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Unifying Insert and InsertText
>
> Hi.
>
> What do people thin
Hi.
What do people think about unifying Insert and InsertText ? Actually, I mean
adding InsertText functionality to Insert? I hope they are not so
incompatibile for that ...Simplier and less confusion for newcomers when
taking first glance on Component Repository ?
-Vjeran
--
No virus found
