re
> the collection in Hidden fields so that the structure of the page is
> preserved when the form is submitted"). So, either provide a custom
> squeezer for your Foo class or just make it serializable.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Norbert Sándor [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
ert Sándor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 4:33 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Persistent Set
You CAN embed For in Form. Actually For supports Form more closely by
the "volatile" parameter.
"Could not find a strategy instance for class Foo.": may
... or of course you can manually call Tapestry.fireObservedChange() at
the end of your listener...
Regards,
Norbi
Norbert Sándor wrote:
You CAN embed For in Form. Actually For supports Form more closely by
the "volatile" parameter.
"Could not find a strategy instance for class Foo.": maybe
You CAN embed For in Form. Actually For supports Form more closely by
the "volatile" parameter.
"Could not find a strategy instance for class Foo.": maybe your Foo is not
serializable, so it cannot be stored in the session? (And you haven't provided a custom
squeezer.)
Set, Map or other colle
Problem solved. Looks like I cannot embed the For in the Form element.
Thanks again.
On 4/22/06, Todd Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, there is a For component on the page the attempts to display all
> the Foos that have been created thus far. I think this is where the
> problem is. If I rem
Also, there is a For component on the page the attempts to display all
the Foos that have been created thus far. I think this is where the
problem is. If I remove the For, it works, but now my user has no idea
how many/which Foos she's already created.
Thanks.
On 4/22/06, Todd Orr <[EMAIL PROTECT
